>>5931721Illusion of free will lies either in
a) ignorant yet extremely complex atom clouds like you o/
b) the "smallest of sense" being somehow driven by another system of collisions and meanings \o/
You know.. if we would to be told that e͟v͟e͟r͟y͟t͟h͟i͟n͟g͟ has a connection with at least X amount of things - which is quite easy to observe within our spectrums already - and that making one move could trace it's results in quadrylion different forms that would later collide with their connections and on, and on..
If we would to take determinism onto possibly highest levels, there would be no longer such thing as singular causes.
If Big Bang still has it's effects on the universe by constant expanding force, fighting with gravitation in an near eternal wrestle, and will provide our universe with such collisions, variables that still shake it's web of causes on a truly universal scale, and will do it till it's end - is there a reason not to believe the old adage "what goes around, comes around"?
If with every second, vibrations on the web of reasons travel, gather, collate as well as collide, and - above all - multiple and gather force from a reason that has born literally everything, constantly and forever as we know it, I ask again - is there really a reason not to believe that even if universe can extinguish it's activity in certain parts of itself, actions can still gather and
complex one another into unimaginable forms - like humans and life <3
>>5931944..or this /ᐠ｡ꞈ｡ᐟ\
Tell your buddy to stop ruining my life views ʕ•ᴥ• ʔ
I would gladly read about how could a mortal observe such effects, bounded by our time-weaved reality.
Unless they like, did micro-stuff in perfectly exact coditions on some atoms or some shit, lole!!
And they've experienced different results /ᐠ｡ꞈ｡ᐟ\ ᶠᵘᶜᵏᶦᶰᵍ ᶰᵉʳᵈˢ
But for real tho - can mankind provide even the smallest of spaces for two atoms to transfer causes twice in a row? With the only difference it being a slightly older universe?
