>>72720I see your determination, but you fight the symptom, not the cause.
First off, let me honest: if you rely on some vague, kinda objectable, theory—not objective fact—to prove your whole point, I don't find it very convincing. Comparatively, I could show you the whole connection between new left and modern financers like Soros (but it's over 3MB, so have this image instead). This is fact, objective reality—not theories about behavior of huge groups of people, declaring a whole gender as basically traitors by nature, based on scarce evidence.
> they aren't equal but want equal power and hate men cause they're inferior which collapses society.Queen Victoria. Joan D'Arc. Russian queens and their shit husbands. Ayn Rand influenced American right tremendously, she was radical anti-communist and pro traditional gender roles (in general). How do they fit in your statement?
>women just spread their legsAre you sure Jamal didn't, um, RAPE them? Also, this is evidenced by what? I'm not sure what women were supposed to do by your logic.
>because you've got a male dictator in putin otherwise you'd be like ukraine right now.More like because Putin is hardcore conservative, and Soros funded Ukraine revolution.
https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-credible-evidence-that-Ukraines-2014-revolution-was-due-to-a-CIA-coup 