Quoted By:
The mere act of comprehending this sentence logically proves the existence of God. Atheists and agnosticucks have absolutely no reply to this air-tight, rational, a priori proof of the existence of God.
For the room-temperature-IQ brainlets (who will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven), here is the deductive logic that follows from that statement:
>Premise: It is a conceptual truth (or, so to speak, true by definition) that God is a being than which none greater can be imagined (that is, the greatest possible being that can be imagined).
>Premise: God exists as an idea in the mind.
>Premise: A being that exists as an idea in the mind and in reality is, other things being equal, greater than a being that exists only as an idea in the mind.
>Premise: Thus, if God exists only as an idea in the mind, then we can imagine something that is greater than God (that is, a greatest possible being that does exist).
>Premise: But we cannot imagine something that is greater than God (for it is a contradiction to suppose that we can imagine a being greater than the greatest possible being that can be imagined.)
>Indisputable conclusion: Therefore, God exists.
What are the political implications of Atheists, and agnostics being completely wrong about the ontological status of God?
