>>21104120>Say they pre-select candidates (easy enough, since they could just have agents looking at people as potential candidates and select them based on how likely a background check suggests they are to be a failure with the winnings, since all lottery winners seem to be utter failures post-winning this seems likely.)Well, you can use the aforementioned quantum random number generation to ensure they have to select their second choice candidate (which means a sort of herd immunity to rigging emerges with more people using quantum random numbers to pick tickets, as it means as long as the number of people playing quantum tickets per draw exceeds the number of pre-screened-failure candidates then there's at least 1 set of worldlines wherein they fail to rig it.)
This means that what you should be doing is:
>take some quantum random number generators - say https://qrng.anu.edu.au/RainBin.php>map to ticket numbers with 37 of those bits:> https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=0000000000000000000000000000000000000+binary+to+decimal (replace those 37 0's with your bits)>take that number and plug it into the "let n = 0;" part of https://jsfiddle.net/emw3va8L/ inplace of 0 on the top line for mega millions, or https://jsfiddle.net/pg2sLnd4/ forpowerball>following the MWI of quantum mechanics this guarantees at least 1 version of you wins(gif related)
