>>15011806>so you cant argue the point on an objective level"Your seething is not an argument" is an objective rebuttal, midwit.
To be verbose because you pRedditors mistaken prose for intelligence, your faggotry is unwarranted of any serious discussion because it's fundamentally rooted in your emotional maelstrom, and the elaborations articulated hence are not constituted in a sound logical argumentum. Your post is an orotund modus demanding a scrutinized refutation of a juvenile ad hominem, to which offering serious consideration is fruitless since it carries no worth in good faith argumentation. To do so legitimizes the misplaced arrogance of the speaker (you) in acknowledgement to the self-attributed worth of the unsubstantial meanderings with which we are anathematized to share webspace.
See? Anyone can do be long winded.
TL;DR: Your seething is not an argument.
