>>13478991Lmao, you poltards are wanking to "facts and logic", but after a proper counterargument, you run away with greentext and shit in the pants.
No one is redefining words. That's just what most of the people mean by "woman" in this day and age. Just like no one uses the word "gay" as in "The Gay Science". It's just how the world works, it's just how people are using words, it's just descriptive linguistics. Cope harder.
>>13479001I didn't even mention the probabilities. These people do exist, and this is a fact. So, you wouldn't consider them female? Lol. Go get a new manual, you're shitting yourself live.
