>>11904664>armed forces or at least properly maintain their anti air missiles so they'd have a shot at killing at least one US aircraftwe did destroy many US aircrafts though, our anti air missiles system wasn't that good i agree but we were on the process of evolving it till 1991 when the sanctions against us started, the only thing we could import was fucking chocolate bars from jordan at the time, i know we are a rich country but you can't expect us to get better militarily while not being able to import systems we were not ready to create, you may say iran has sanctions too but iran now has china and russia as allies, we had NO ONE,
>And they wonder why the lost a war against a country in the middle of a civil war who's only ally at the time was fucking Israel of all nations.AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH, champ, we won the war, iran's military was 2 times bigger and stronger than us, and the US did ally with iran during the middle of the war, same goes for china, soviet union , france and north korea, this "they had no allies" meme is a joke on itself lmao, also,
> If your gonna drool out the mouth for a Ba'athist tyrant at least make it one who was actually fucking competent like Gamal Nasser who managed to secure Egypt's right to the Suez Canal.nasser is the reason egypt and the mashiq is unstable, he was not a baathist, he was more of an egyptian nationalist, he stood against abd al karim qassim, my favourite iraqi leader, qassim was the true leader we didn't deserve, nasser was afraid of the popularity of qassem in the middle east and northren africa thus he collaborated with the CIA to take him down, again we didn't deserve qassim, we deserved saddam, when the whole world fights against you TWICE you know you did something right.
saddam was not "good" or "bad", saddam was just saddam, he has his own values when it comes to righthood and falsehood.
