>>15701911The cake, sucks. In every way. There's not a single redeeming thing in that cake. I'll start from the top, I guess. First of all, this retarded notion that the more fancy looking you stick on top of a cake, the better it gets. It doesn't. Stop putting roses on top of cakes. I think it's not an actual rose, I've been told before, they make these sweet roses or something, solely to put them on top of cakes. It absolutely sucks, there's nothing I can imagine about that, making the cake better. The only reason it's put in there, is so it can look all fancy being on top of the cake, and a picture of it can be taken. It's not there to enhance the experience of actually having the cake, in any way whatsoever. That already makes it a cake that deserves getting thrown away, good on her, she's doing a service. Whoever made that cake deserves all their work getting wasted, because of that one decision to put stupid stuff on top of it. And, I'm not excusing the fruit, either. The thing is, sure, fruit is good, and cakes are good, but that doesn't outright mean having fruit and cake together is a good combination. It's not. They're things that should be enjoyed individually. When you're having a cake, the only thing there should be is the cake. When some fruit gets added into the mix, I suppose it can still taste good, but it's just wasting the experience. I wonder if I can explain it. I think once you have fruit alongside a cake, it takes away your focus from the cake. You're not just thinking about how good the cake is anymore, you're diverting at least half of your attention to the fruit you're tasting, also. I think this is a bad thing, because getting to enjoy a cake, at least for me, is a very special occasion. I could have some fruit pretty much anytime I want, but a cake, I get to have like twice a year. The access to fruit is way easier than cake, basically. That's why I believe that the cake should be had alone wit-Part 4.