>>19678437there are many evidence that homosexuality is a natural attraction determined during the INTRA-UTERINE brain development, following genetic, epigenetic and enviroinmental factors.
There are a number of morphological traits that positively correlate with it (digit ratio (i.e. longer index finger = less testosterone,) thinness of the jaw, and some others.) This is so strong, in fact, that a computer can accurately identify a homosexual from facial topology alone 80% of the time. If homosexuality were merely a psychological cope or a byproduct of psychological trauma, we wouldn't expect such strong correlates with morphology.
https://nymag.com/news/features/33520/https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41188560Regarding sexual abuse, it is true that homosexuals, on average, are more likely than heterosexuals to have experienced childhood sexual abuse. However, studies have also shown that effeminate heterosexual boys are at a higher risk of molestation, while masculine homosexual boys are at a lower risk of molestation. If gender nonconformity (effeminacy) exposes children to a higher risk of molestation (it also exposes them to a higher risk of physical abuse too), then naturally homosexuals will experience elevated rates of childhood molestation compared to heterosexuals, because most homosexuals are gender nonconforming as children. Furthermore, 'pre-gay' children are often identifiably different from their peers from a very early age (about 3 years), before any molestation occurs.
also most of that sexual abuse was consensual teenage experience with older males.
gays never look average, they're always either truecel teir borderline deformed subhumans or they're model teir prettyboy Chadlites.
