>>12899488>I'm curious as to why I haven't heard more about this in historical textbooks and peer reviewed literature.Probably because it’s made up horse shit. If people were having gay sex even in private in the 1700s that was grounds for public execution. But this nonsense purports that it was actually a common practice for white slave owners to openly have gay sex with their slaves in public. Like in front of people. And this was a known practice. Lmao a person even suspected in engaging in gay sex would have been tarred and feathered. And then killed.