>>21215606Wow this is some interesting speculation, i will think...
> how did the people of the past deal with the unbearable shittyness of lifeHuman nature seems incredibly malleable and conforms to every niche, like sailors on a ship being able to live like that for years, I guess you get used to it. More than that, human nature seems inherently social, since we live in a society, we are not solitary hunters, we even have families, tribes, communities, grand-parents, we are social animals, think of how fast babies learn speech, in fact even thinking is not isolated from society because it's done in language which came about as a social process, language wasn't invented by a guy and imposed on other people unless you are tolkien or polly and want to make fantasy languages
>historically a man's role in the affairs becomes smaller and smallerI would say it's because making things is done by society nowadays, not isolated individuals on a farm or in their workshop. The huge machines and factories and supply chains can only be operated by increasingly larger groups of men, really society as a whole, not an individual. And this nessitates the "greater orders of authority over themselves " that you notice. But! i think this change was a great thing, think of how awesome the technology and productive power of now, even 1850, is compared to mediveal times, the vast productive power, massive canals, just huge, colossal things, railways, the internet. I'm a soijak that wears the f*cking love science shirt. Also getting rid of industry would kill 90% of the population
>will the government-free world ever be achievedyou would have to come up with a definition of a government that is different from all the other organisational bodies humans have come up with. Companies can have millions of employees so it cant be size. Also governments exist because of reasons that cause their existence, and these reasons didn't exist for most of history when we were hunter gatherers
