>>12035342Despite your ebin habbening speech mode I am enough of a pseudoschitzo to believe you are right about everything.
Yet. Do not rule out cryptocurrencies as a new third alternative to the global hedgemony legacy financial systems dominance. Without real decentralization might does make right and china in effect got a digital central bank unit the nationalized serfs are forced to use in daily trade. China is the WEFs future model of complete control and a playground for their control. History will hryme and not repeat itself completely.
Now, different governments have their different digital payment systems, more or less privatized. China is 100% communist, so others might fall under totalitarinaism away from the dollar, as the trade war unfolds and the intrastructure needed for market manipulation might shift in someones favor. Yet sems unlikely to me, but 5 years of diversity quotas in the military gives them less and less muscle and makes them rely on their information network more heavily. Behind this, the accountants still call the shots, and commodities are getting more solid the longer into a Japanese-like stagflation timeline we get.
My bet is sticking to the most free and unneedingly regulated marketsplace you can trust. Stonks are the new silver, in that respect, I believe, how they are traded by the banks and globopedo circles and Robinhood as a phenomenon shows how strange marketplaces have become, pseudo-shifting units of value between scammers on every level, regulatory and technical. Bitcoin is already blockstream-central bank subverted on protocol level but is becoming stronger on one premise alone: Scarcity.
Which leaves us to reminesence about gold and silver. These assets aren't traded across the borders any more likely than a tanker will cross the waters in some parts of the world, and some governments tax silver, but not gold, to keep the nobles in check of rising.
