>>11069497>There exists countries that had complete control over their victims and still weren't able to wipe them completely out with a genocideThe use of the terms "complete controll" and "wipe them out completely" are contradictory possits anon
A state could have had ALOT of controll to genocide a people and still failed
But if the controll was trully COMPLETE (IE something unpar with having them rounded up together in the same fucking place they group couldnt escape)
If there were any survivors?
The state was not infact trully trying.
>(like the Soviets with the Ukranian farmers or the country of Rwanda with the TutsiIn both of these instances the state did not infact have complete controll.
>You're reasoning is incorrect because its contradiction has happened before, several timesNo it hasnt
You are just mistaking a great degree of controll with complete controll
Hard to se im sure
But important for the argument.
