>>11767199classic asiatics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcLfFX7iTLk>>11767223nah, i don't think i'm old enough to be out of touch yet. i may not know any current celebs or ecelebs but i think low quality output from a supposed professional is still pretty universally recognizable. there's no way that even the tranniest of trannies thinks calarts is good animation. they might have copes like "hurr it's about the writing bro, you're just superficial" but there's no way anyone thinks that shit looks good.
is that the official calarts party line? not very persuasive
