>>13039682>If he is not all loving, all knowing, all powerful, he cannot be god.Pic related describes an "all loving God, all knowing, all powerful God". The irony is that this argument is irrelevant
>God doesn't need to be all loving to torture you for eternity>He just needs to hate you>God doesn't need to be all knowing to torture you for eternity>He just needs to know enough to compel him to torture you>God doesn't need to be all powerful to torture you for eternity>He just needs to be more powerful than you to torture you for eternityThat's the point I'm making. God was never "All powerful" at any point in the Bible. Clearly the Bible is God attempting to find an ally to help him wage a war on Canaanites because these people worship the god Hadad, who killed Yahweh's brother, Yam.
>"Thou shalt have no other gods before me.">God is saying "YOU will have no other gods before me". >He's not saying "There were are no other Gods before me">he's not saying "There are no other Gods more powerful than me", >God is saying "You will worship only me, because otherwise my wrath will be unleashed upon you"That's what the fuck this says. The first commandment doesn't say "Yahweh Elohim is the only God that has ever existed and is all powerful and all knowing". The God in the Bible isn't even the creator God. The Creator God is El, God of the Sky, who is the father of Yahweh Elohim, who is the God of War.
>>13039669>Two coherent sentences>"schizobabble"Are you a fucking abo, mate? You spend all day sniffing petrol and sleeping in the road? How the fuck did you figure out how to use the internet.
>>13039672Look at this sentence you aussie faggot. This man actually provides a clear and accurate rebuttal to the fucking argument I provide. Not only is he able to understand the argument I make, but he can understand it so well he can argue a strong point that attacks my main premise.
Look at
