>>11883972>humans and robotswe did, however not everybody falls in either cathegory
cyborgs maybe? robots can have a way of copying each other's system files, cyborgs can too, but they can also copy human behaviour as they are part human themselves
fickle thing, don't lean on either side- either go extreme on both ends like a radical centrist or don't follow anybody like a lukewarm centrist
>sound enoughthey follow some basic pronciples, but they aren't morally absolutist
though I think all murder is bad killing some people sometimes is dismissable (even civilians, even many of them)
however the duty of killing should only be bestowed upon demon cleaners and demon executives; those that have enough experience and theoretical knowledge to know who has to be killed and why
the executives are here to obaerve why cleaners kill whom they kill as it would very much be a legal issue so giving them right to kill whomever is a bad idea, unless they kill in self defrnse if they were even to atempt killing somebody who should not be killed they would be forcibly suicided
if an executive were to forcibly suicide a cleaner they would be forcibly suicided by other executives
however cleaners and executives would necessarily be anarchistic and vigilante centred, which cannot be legaly achieved, otherwise they would just become mercanaries that would be sold to the highest bidder
>crucialwell yes, omitting an allergy or threat which directly causes somebody to die or suffer greatly is an act of manslaughter or whatever if they survive
not something you want
but most omissions would be like "I've smoked weed with Jeff last night between 3 pm and 6 pm, but I know you don't like Jeff cause he beats his wife, but I don't care for his wife and Jeff is rather nice to me", but it's not like I'd start beating her because of Jeff
I'd start beating her because it turns me on and I have S&M toys so why not
