>>15694971>>15694972>>15694973>>156949741. False. Though it is 99% similar, the 1% leads to vast differences. We share 99% of our DNA with LITERAL chimpanzees as well.
https://www.science.org/content/article/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives#:~:text=Ever%20since%20researchers%20sequenced%20the,them%20our%20closest%20living%20relatives.
2. Yes, there is such a thing as racial purity, it means to not mix races. Yes, it is rare, and there are a lot of passing individuals, but scarcity does not mean something does not exist, just that it's rare. If you go back x many years, we're all inbred cave dwellers.
3. This is the one with the most leeway on. If a people CONQUER a land, it is currently theirs, though the former nation will still have a claim to it. The Americans conquered North America, yet the Natives still have a claim to the land. Will they be able to fight and conquer it? Not in a million years.
4. Yes, they can. Though, multiple Geneology websites have been caught diluting reports in order to piss off one-droppers.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dna-testing-companies-admit-altering-tests-screw-racists/ Snopes fact check lol
5. Yes, they evolved in the middle of a flat savannah, and are better at running than whites, which evolved in a cold, mountainous/hilly Europe which favored in-group selection, stockier builds, and intelligence.
Not saying all whites are superior to every black, there are exceptions to every rule, but races are a very real thing and to deny them is dangerous to future generations
