>>11569788>1. Being unable to explain your worldview in simple everyday language means you are stupid not smart.ask a question
>2. The use of complex, verbose and academic language can just as much be construed to be a trick, or a manipulation, or a basic lack of frankness, then your intended purpose that is to wow people.>complexity>complicationyour accusations are over-deterministic
>3. Bringing down this discussion to colour, again, suggests you have no idea what any racially based discussion is or should be about, which is genetics first, then the expression of genetics through for example bone structure or immune system.see: picrel
A functional system which constructs meaning through reference of itself does not rely upon external references. I do not disregard genetics whatsoever. I understand genetics quit well
>>11569777>The likelihood any two people who share truth will share common ancestry is explanation for why people self organize among the identity shared communicatively >The coevolution of natural language analogs the causal relationships we observe when order emerges from social relationships between peopleHowever, genetics are not the cause of genetics. To construct a viable functional system requires recursive identity (you know, that I know, that we know).
>>11569785We choose each other as the cause of our existence where politics = Being with Beings. We define who we are by what means we are limited in expressing our existence.
see pic:
>>11569777 