>>20438694Anon, since you prefaced your post with
>Honest questionI figured I'd give you an honest, good-faith answer, without calling you a projectionfag or posting one of your many cringe seethelord screencaps. I don't think I could have been more objective and reasonable and still convey the big-picture answer to your larger question.
I've said before that replying to you in good faith was wasted effort; that you mirror and project and deflect instead of ever actually addressing the points or substantive themes, but I wanted to give it one last try just in case there was *any* hope of getting through to you.
>desperate essay full of ad-hominems and half-truthsYeah... more mischaracterisations and deflection as usual and a wasted effort as expected. You're a terribly disappointing specimen anon, but I'll never make that mistake again.
