>>8938275yeah that coupled with the framing of the video too
true, I guess its the amount of members scrapping the 160 cm line and below that makes it seems more apparent here. That and body proportions that helps a bit with the height perception
>>8938277I think this is second time you've linked me this so yes, I have. Buuut, have you seen this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppOsbIrj3pA ?