>>21955658>>21955691>>21955974>I would argue that europe has it worse, specially when countries go around increasing retirement age leading to the workforce in that sector getting olderYou're correct.
And this is what is actually very puzzling to me.
Every politician, every goodgoy, every capitalist, every numbergoupperlolbert always talks about
>you need to work more>you need to work longer>you need to work more efficient>you need to work more like DAFT PUNK was singingAND OF COURSE
>WE NEED MORE PEOPLEWhich all lead to the time of occupancy at every job increasing, yet it's desired the workload to be done more efficiently, which means also faster. Which then required more workload to be there that can be worked at. And on and on it goes.
How the fuck is this going to work out with an increasing life expectancy, more people on this planet, more immigration in overpopulated western countries...
How?
Someone explain, please.
Therefore I honestly believe that muh rona was the double fucking whammy of missed opportunities which only come every once in a millennia.
They should've either let le virus run rampant, naturally. Letting it cause whatever it would have unobstructed.
OR
Making sure that the rona shot was the vehicle for depopulation.
Somebody really explain how this is supposed to work out in the end?
hardmode: can't use war or another pandemic as event horizon 