>>17481846The origin of chicken washing is both fascinating and comical: blacks were taught to "clean" chickens centuries ago. Originally, "to clean a fowl" meant to strip it of feathers before cooking; this use of the word "clean" is still used by hunters and farmers who kill and prepare their own meats, but the same meaning is less commonly in use where meat is purchased from urban supermarkets. However, it's part of "black culture" to "clean chicken" still, even though the practical purpose of the original practice is lost and misunderstood by urban blacks. They simply continue to "clean" them according to how they understand the word "clean" in a modern urban context, ie, cleaning plucked (previously "cleaned") birds in a sink with dish soap. They have no understanding of microbiology, bacteria, or how this practice might make their meal MORE dangerous that relying on heat to cook (and therefore "clean") their food and remove health risks. They think the soap and water they subject the meat to somehow removes health risks, and any law or regulation demanding they cook the meat to a specific temperature in which micro-organisms cannot survive is both racist and culturally insensitive. Their "black culture" has been disrespected and de-valued by laws requiring chicken be cooked to 165 degrees Fahrenheit, but not "cleaned" with dish soap, which might taint the meat with inedible chemicals. Blacks cannot be dissuaded from this perspective:
>becuz whitey don lied bout dem tuskeegee shots n sheeitSo blacks will continue into the future to "wash dey chikeein" with soap and water, without any clear idea why they do this except that "it black culchur" and "dey gramma don eet". You could probably convince them that eating the birds WITH feathers was also an African tradition if you had enough twitter bots to promote the idea. You can convince blacks of any dumb idea this way, they have no clue what's authentically black except what TV/twitter tell them is.
