>>16322583i mean the weirdest thing i saw about the satanist thing is the wikileaks email from hillary clinton's senior advisor explicitly saying she was going to sacrifice a chicken to moloch, it could be a joke but who the fuck jokes about moloch but yeah thats the most compelling thing i saw about that, idk any of the other reasons people give to substantiate the meme but thats offtopic
>what, the angels influence just wasnt as powerful as the demons?>or is it that humans with their free will just choose to do these bad things more than the good?i think people usually say it's more the 2nd but i know people also say the demons are fallen angels or whatever and now that reminds me that i forgot to read the mexican posts... ahh maybe later, but yeah idk maybe the angels have to "follow the rules" with their powers and the demons don't, kinda like police vs crminial gangs, sure the gangs have their own rules too but they have more freedom than the cops
>but if "free will" is nothing more than adhering to either the urge of "good or "bad" then how do the circumstances a lot of people are in reflect thati suppose the notion of free will is separate from the notion of morality, like just because your circumstances make it so you're probably going to make the "bad" choice, that doesn't make you a bad person, the "bad choice" on its own may be bad but the circumstances that led you to the point of making the decision are still morally relevant. but even that word i used earlier ("probably") is nagging at me because circumstances have so much impact on people, we can predict with really high accuracy the outcomes for people based on their circumstances so if everyone is predictably "choosing", are they really choosing? i guess predictability doesn't necessarily disprove free will, i mean just because we're free to choose doesn't mean we're going to choose randomly, right? there's still stuff we want and value so obviously we'd choose based on those criteria lim