>>11304874I have to say, this is a disastrous PR stunt for you. Besides, if Croat feds will want some proof of your deviancy...
>you have a very reductive and simplistic approach to sexI care little about sex, I care about what will happen to the child's mental health later on. Children can do things they don't want to without saying a word about it, as they don't want to upset the adult or they fear being punished or they know that if they don't do it they won't get whatever the pedophile promised to reward them with. Moreover, explaining it to them may not go well either, as in the one who is doing it may do it in such a way that the child is manipulated into thinking that there is nothing to be scared of and being essentially raped by an adult is alright. And yes, you can manipulate adults too. If I coerce a mature yet mentally disabled woman into having sex with me it would still be messed up.
>it didn't go beyond that and I asume it was more of a test- I hope that it was an accident but I can never be sureWell I think the difference is quite easy to tell, you don't just diddle a child by accident. In any case, if you do know what it is like then how can you propose such things? Or did you not really believe them and were playing devil's advocate? We've come this far, it's quite difficult to back down as nobody would believe it, especially since you were always open about your "hebephilia".
>I'm suggesting that you might be overhyping it and that it might not provide you with happinessNone of that was about me wanting to be with an older woman, it was about purpose and happiness, or the lack thereof.
>until a set of deviants group together and produce more deviants that then become majorityOf course. So, technically, you could create your entire community of whatever you want to call them and in that specific community it would be seen as normal. Still, you know that I would disagree with it, whether that is the other end of the same coin or not.