>>20364702seconded
>>20364691>My aggressive buying is based on the betseems like your reasoning is a bit biased.
I can see it go back to mid 20's but I'm only basing it off of my own personal want of cheapies. And knowledge that they can just basically make it go to whatever they want. And 25 is more of the same that they want to make it seem. I don't know if they really have that much control, but looking at the amount volume that pushed us to those heights weren't that high to begin with. I don't know the end game but 25 is still on the menu in my book.
>>20364703Thanks for sharing regardless.
