>>6117181It's a j-joke, don't worry <4
>>6117183What are you even t-talking about?
>>6117184T-they won't attention whoring?
Sorry, I d-don't know how to parse this.
>>6117192I'll t-take a look, thank you kindly.
I'll ask you a q-question too, since I c-could use the feedback. I c-currently have a TTS function through streamlabs I think. I c-currently have it set to a dollar or something, t-to prevent abuse, but I w-was thinking of making it run off a small number of bits, something that c-could be easily farmed from an ad, but would p-prevent abuse (4chan loves to shout things that could get me banned).
Do you think this is an acceptable compromise? It l-looks like some of the controls you are talking about m-mean I could restrict it so only small numbers of bits could be donated, allowing its use for TTS.
>>6117196D-don't worry dear, I'm going to soon.
