>>19938453While it's true that individuals may hold nuanced views on different moral issues, the apparent inconsistency between attitudes towards abortion and the treatment of animals cannot be dismissed so easily. The core issue here is not just about holding nuanced views but rather about the logical coherence of those views. Individuals who support abortion rights often justify their stance based on factors such as bodily autonomy, consciousness, and the ability to suffer. However, when it comes to animals, they may not extend the same considerations, despite similarities in consciousness, ability to suffer, and viability. This disconnect raises questions about the consistency of moral principles applied. If consciousness, viability, and the ability to suffer are considered morally relevant factors for the protection of human life, then why are they not given the same weight when it comes to animals?
