>>8304130Counterarguments:
>"i was framed!”I see you bring this up a lot. To be honest, no one cares about you enough to frame you. Even if they did, the sheer volume of posts would be extremely difficult to fake. What’s more likely, the poster with hundreds of ‘loli’ images saved on his computer is attracted to ‘lolis’? Or someone went out of their way and spent literal months trying to drag a stranger’s name through the mud?
>”don't bully me!”This isn’t bullying, this is confronting you with your own actions. And trying to act cute doesn’t change the fact that you posted loli porn and make sexual remarks about little girls.
>”obsessed”Obsessed with outing pedo scum, yes.
To summarise, you are a pedo. You have a long history of pedophilic posts both on /int/ and /bant/, and as "lolimaster™” on /s4s/. You make sexual remarks about underage girls both real and animated, and have posted actual loli porn. You claim you were framed, but the sheer amount of posts made over the course of months basically rules this out entirely. The saddest part is that I initially wanted to prove you innocence, but I simply found too much evidence on the on the contrary. There is zero doubt in my mind that you are guilty.
the end. thanks for reading lole
(5/5)
