>>10739411>I Tess been used before and it’s really not necessary.Idk what that means. But no, the picture perfectly illustrates the point being made.
>>10739413Thanks. Care to share some of your art?
>>10739416Thanks anon.
>>10739385Honestly, it's difficult to precisely define Metamodernism because it's probably still in its infancy. If you're interested in hearing a good take on it, you should check out the video I cited in my article. As for my own beliefs, I think Metamodernism is at this point a reaction to Postmodernism. It's basically pointing out the idiocy of deconstructing traditional values because they're arbitrary or subjective without instituting something in their place. Traditional values can be justified pragmatically rather than accepted a-priori, and that's what Metamodernism does—it's asserting traditional values from a Modern/Postmodern framework via pragmatism. I'm not sure that this will be the movement that restores Europe to glory but it's laying the groundwork for future movements at the very least because it's showing that we can synthesize the past with the present to move forward. I guess that's the Hegelian dialectic in a nutshell, lol. I didn't even mean to take it there, I just made that connection.
>>10739418Based and true.
