Quoted By:
The argument over the wall is like that water level in a tilted glass quiz. Something about the woman brain just can't comprehend it. You have to Common Core it for them by breaking it down into more easily digested facts and draw a graph as you go.
>When you were 20 years old, were 30 year old men interested in you?
>Did you return that interest? (They ALWAYS have an age gap relationship on their resume that they use as an example for why age gaps are bad.)
>Now that you're 30 years old, are 30 year old men interested in 20 year old women?
>Do they return that interest? (Women are tempted to say no, but tell on themselves by how often they complain about age gaps and those men not being able to find women their age "willing to put up with their shit".)
>Now that you're 30 years old, are you interested in 20 year old men?
>Do they return that interest?
Right there, immediately, an hourglass population where there are less men available to a 30 year old woman than there are women available to a 30 year old man, a complete inversion of them respectively at 20.
>Now that you're 30 years old, do otherwise eligible men have traits that make you apprehensive about having your time wasted by them?
Right there, they willfully narrow it down even further for themselves.
>Now that you're 30 years old, do you have anything to offer that this very small pool of eligible men that they can't find elsewhere, namely in 20 year old women? (Women are tempted to say yes that their careers and "experiences" are valuable, but find themselves in non-committed "situationships" with flaky men).
And just like that, their ideal man is a unicorn—but this has all been a waste of time, because this is the part where they say "no but" and start smearing woman logic all over everything.
