>>12042921So that's two points.
>The faggot should always insist on protectionClean on clean is fine, condoms aren't always going to be available, certainly not in the quantities a faggot servicing and entire tank platoon (15-20 men) on a daily basis would require.
And it is a gay fantasy, not mine, but a way for all the sissies and twinks to be a part of, and in service to, a healthy society. An open door to a better life where their natures are put to good use rather than allowing them to infect the mainstream.
You only have to listen to them crying out on /bant/ and /pol/, they don't want to be the problem, they don't want Jewish propaganda, they want to be a part of OUR perfect society.
Tankery, properly understood, solves all problems.
>It's okay to have women in the tanks as long as they always use a condom.And this is the exact opposite. Because now you are forcing women to forgoe their god given purposes of mothers and wives in order to be used as a prostitute by a war machine that is supposed to protect them from the evils of the world so they can be wives and mothers. The problem of not enough condoms can be solved by sterilizing them but that is even worse, forever denying their natures in order to accelerate their degeneracy to the maximum. This is not tankery at all.
No, what's needed is a Women's Auxilliary Armoured Corps, where women are taken in in their late teens, partnered with middle aged veterans who are too old to fight but financially secure and responsible enough to start a family, so they can have kids while undergoing their training for full service once the kids are old enough to be left with dad.
Through tankery they learn community, femininity, responsibility, and build confidence in their place in society which is made secure by their service as tankers.
And THAT is tankery properly understood.
