Quoted By:
I have an anecdote about how USA law works. Say you talk to a credit card company on the phone and you discuss the APR, fees, and schedule. Then the agent says, "Ok, I will email you the form to sign and then I will send you the credit card." Then you just open your email and click it and that's the end of it. Then the credit card company takes the contract to a judge and shows him the contract. Unbeknownst to you, the credit card company inserted some fraud language about gaining ownership of your car and house, and how it is entitled to 100% of your future earnings. The credit card company shows the contract to the judge and then asks for the judge to issue a writ of possession on your car and house and a garnishment on your wages. Although the USA does say that a contract is valid if it is signed and it is also voidable if it is fraudulent, a judge would not issue the writ of possession. The judge would look at the contract, see something was fishy, and then call the counterparty to appear to testify regarding the fraud language in the contract. So then the card company would not get the writ because of the proper judicial discretion of the judge not to blindly accept a signed document without consulting both parties.
For John Roberts, since he was the credit card agent who defrauded me as the hiring manager at Exide, he can just go ahead and issue the writ of possession when the FBI brings the fraud contract to him. He will not call me to verify since he knows very well that he defrauded me. He allows the FBI to say it didn't do defraud me because Roberts did it. This is also why the FISA court, whose judges are chosen by Roberts, doesn't ever call the counterparty and only the FBI gets to make its case with no defense of the defendant. However, this matter of the fraud paperwork from the plot of 2016 isn't a FISC thing. It's just USA tort law and I could undo their fraud, I think, if I could get a copy of whatever hiring paperwork they sent me.
