>>16541206the best argument is probably avoiding potential regret, and attracting the wrong women, having girlfriends/wives justify getting tattoos by you having them if they don't have any already.
tattoos are so extremely common now. most of the /pol/ views on it are basically meaningless and boomer pseudo-masculinity, i would say 90% of tattoos are terrible, but it's just fashion. if you like them then get something you don't regret and won't get in the way of anything.
also kikes can't get tattoos. tattoos make women more likely to see you eligible for short term relationship, its theorized tattoos are similar to scarring, it signals the body survived some kind of trauma indicating good immune system and risk-taking/high test behaviour.
t. have zero tattoos
>>16541275most people in far right circles are working class people with tattoos, like 50% of people 18-35 have tattoos nowadays. you're just out of touch and larping as some kind of traditionality that you don't actually understand. plenty of actual aristocratic traditionalists had tattoos back in the day.
