>>12824877>Empirical evidence is the information received by means of the senses, particularly by observation and documentation of patterns and behavior through experimentation.[1] The term comes from Greek ἐμπειρία empeiría 'experience'. 2 apples plus 2 apples are 4 apples in total. This makes 2+2=4 in this context empirical and was just an example.
>Our math for „gravity“ meaning things falling is exactly the same. We just don’t make up the claim it’s masses pulling at each other. so you have no idea why things fall but admit gravity is the best answer? Wow you let round earth win by default becouse you have no answer? Thx
>The moon likely isn’t a physical object. Neither we nor they can calculate the real distance, but if you manage to pull up the literature, how they arrived at the alleged distances I can show you how they didn’t really do it. Nice relativism, sadly this isnt helping.
>It’s the same in the flat earth model.but only the round earth answers the why it is.
>you failed to greentextNew low achieved! See i can be an ass too.
>They almost always calculate from the alleged center. Another thing they can’t demonstrate. And you misunderstood them. It doesn’t depend where you are on earth according to them, but on the time meaning the position of the earth and the moon in their relative motions.see image and explain how it works in your flat earth worldview. Spoiler: it cant without beeing more then just upside down.
>i dont answer your question here are some escape video.nice
not only the moon is fake is also beyond numbers to discripe.
Why i am even talking to you? You dont want to explain things to me... you just want to spam your coolaid.
