>>23904235>Don't you see the paradoxYou are beyond comical at this point. What you are demonstrating is your own retardation and inability to think.
>Aha you pointed out that our methods are all invalid and this is a fact>HOWEVER DoYoU Nott See ThIs Is A PaRaDoXXXX?>they were wrong and make correctionsAre you retarded?
When was the last time le scientists admitted they where le wrong about the boiling point of water? Answer this.
>THEY ADMITTED THEY WHERE WRONG!How is this possible if your method is to be trusted?
If the method is invalid then it is nothing more then fanciful speculation that belongs right next to ghost hunting and all the other crap that science rejects. it should never be taken seriously and children should not be indoctrinated into this garbage.
It should be legally required(or it is false advertising) that all scientists say
>There is only a 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% chance that any of this bullshit we tell you is even real in the most optimistic scenario.>THEY ADMITTED THEY WHERE WRONG!????
This is true for everything!
Crazy cults predictions fail?
GREAT NEWS THEY ARE ADMITTING THEY ARE WRONG and le adjusting to evidence.
>make corrections over the years in the first place?This is true for literally everything
Catholicism changes after 500 years since a new theological doctrine is fashionable?
They are le great and making corrections to their models
>Whales haveOh look someone does not understand what the word ABSURD or EXTREMELY ABSURD means! Hint it does not mean it is impossible
Claiming that you got 100% right on a test by randomly selecting the answers based on coin flips is unlikely and unbelievable
Claiming that you got 100% right on 5 tests by randomly selecting the answers based on coin flips is extremely unlikely and absurd
Claiming that you got 100% right on 20 tests by randomly selecting the answers based on coin flips is extremely absurd
