>>16494050>NO!Maybe when your child is taken as a sex slave one day you'll reconsider your position. Perhaps a priest will be there to tell you to calm down and remind you that after all, the criminal act that has just occurred is a violation of doctrine but in and of itself is really not immoral in essense.
>Anon, I.......... do you want me to address this, because again you don't seem to fully understand how the Catholic church works and what the limits on the authorial it.Nothing to address. Just an illustration of Christian dishonesty. "Oh no, no, no... we didn't change the law ! It's still innately moral ! You just can't do it, that would be immoral." Good luck with your brown brothers in the next 100 years.
>>16494053>No.I knew it. The eternal golem could watch his daughter marry a negro and his son get taken as a slave but would claim none of these or innately immoral because a Jewish bronze age book says so !
>You ask me about Catholic DoctrineNo. I asked about morality. You brought that up to justify a MAJOR inconsistency when it comes to teachings on slavery. As I've said above "We didn't change the law ! It's still innately moral ! You just can't do it, that would be immoral." Cognitive dissonance of the highest degree.
>Are you aware you are a salty little bitch?"Let there be no filthiness nor foolish talk nor crude joking, which are out of place, but instead let there be thanksgiving." Go kiss the feet moron.
