>>2733791Now here is a linguistic difference between us desu. For me, 'щ' would be soft 'ź' (so the 'зь' I believe) and 'ш' itself would be soft 'ж'. It's just how Polish is desu, it makes more sense in our spelling I think; accordingly: 'ś' is soft 'ź' and 'sz' is soft 'rz'/'ż'. Oh, just noticed it doesn't really make that much sense either desu.
Wait, I always pronounce stuff like "-eшь" the same as I would be pronouncing "-eш" desu, is that an error?
Yes, I get that desu, but I always find myself not remembering whihc letters in which words should be softened desu, and the difference in pronounciation is too smal for me I believe.