>>22948042>>22948045Meanwhile
Biracial White-Asian individuals are less likely to have a mental illness than monoracial whites. Monoracial Asians are the least likely to have mental illnesses out of any other race. Monoracial whites are the most likely to have mental illnesses, only surpassed by Ashkenazi Jews. Biracial White-Asian individuals are half or less as likely as monoracial whites to have a mental illness.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30547212/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30594752/https://web.archive.org/web/20230922214732/https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/Assets/PDF/FINAL_Mens_Health_Data_Brief.pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26198764/Frequently spammed propaganda by anti-WMAF posters fail to include this data in an attempt to frame the offspring of WMAF as having high mental health risks.
https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health>Zane and Berger did not look at the mental health of non-Asian Americans.Biracial White-Asian individuals have as good or better chances of finding a mate as monoracial whites. Anti-WMAF posters always use Elliot or some other jew as propaganda.
https://archive.md/nXOse#selection-677.0-681.264>We found that three multiracial groups received a “dividend effect.” Asian-white women were viewed more favorably than any other group of women by white and Asian men, beating out women of the same race or ethnic group. Asian-white and Hispanic-white men were also afforded “dividend” status by Asian and Hispanic women respectively. Asian and Hispanic women responded more frequently to the multiracial men than to either their coethnic men or to whites.>Although white women did not prefer Asian-white men to white men, they did respond to this group as frequently as to white men. This is in practice a multiracial dividend, because white women responded to monoracial Asian men as infrequently as they did to blacks. 