>>22572325whats the point of having position sizes that are ~500$? that's not even 1% of your total portfolio value
everybody seems to know about position size maximums when it comes to trading, but people ignore that you're supposed to have position size minimums too. i dont see the point in having a 1% or less position size for equities unless it's a 2-3x levered ETF, which would be behaving like a 2-3% position size
1% position size is like what i would use for a levered product like options or 3x levered ETFs, not for just regular shares of a stock
