>>20213894>Do they make the rule? Again the mere fact of incels existing disproves your claim of "infinite exceptionsIm not the one trying to make rules defining love, you brought both of them up and both of them are "exceptions" to your rule, among many.
>All of my arguments are based off what is documented extensivelyYou've literally admitted all of this is based off your ideal world and the only examples you have brought up contradict your rules
>you still fail to defend how love cannot be explainedAh but who has the goldfish memory? I didn't say it cannot be explained, I said it hasn't been, but that poetry has come closest.
>dismissing dennettYou appealed to his authority without substance so I denigrated his authority without requiring substance, make an argument if you want a response.
>Already preparing copeI have things to do lol. Have fun posting here though, it seems like you do a lot of it, maybe I'll drop by again sometime to do some more wholesome cuteposting, bye!
