>>17500235>read his bookI did, and I disagree with his 5% of his big claims but agree with the other 95%, I need to debate/talk to him again but it's been months since I've spoken to him
Like I already said, he cannot imagine a world where hardcoded limits are put into place for genetic editing. The issue becomes when China/India start doing their gene editing autism
This all seems moot in the end, because he cares more about "being right" than trying to solve the issue or convince elites, he should have stayed in University and try to publish there, now he has been discredited just to be based and redpilled on race
>>17500240poor argument, so long as you keep human genetics within the 6-7 standard deviations of the current human gene pool it can be done
just never put non-human DNA into our genome like China has already been accused of doing with their Chimera human hybrids
