>>1786274>The fact that people gave a bunch of wrong answers doesn't mean that the intent is unclear.But it does say something about your statement, doesn't it?
>You don't ever read the posts you respond to, do you? Like I said, you could make this complain about any question formulated in a natural language. Does this mean that (>>1781549) is a philosophical question, or that the average SAT math problem is a philosophical question? Not in any meaningful sense.You don't ever read the posts you respond to, do you? I never said it was a philosophical question, I sad it was more to the likes of one, and less of a math one, but nice try at grasping straws.
Philosophy tackles on more abstract and profound shades than math does, and guess what we are talking about? A seemingly illogical question with very ambiguous undertones.
