>>10162470>you can't say it's false because it's just unlikelyi can say the whole universe doesn't exist if we're just gonna get into the unprovable
it's a great video for exactly one reason, the realization of the disproportionate response. trying to push an obviously false conspiracy is bad for multiple reasons:
>you are pushing a distrust in the current US governmentespecially the executive, right before an election where presumably you want the sitting administration to be re-elected. the people you are going to reach to the most with that kind of appeal will become more jaded against trump instead of more likely to support him
>you are pushing a theory that appeals to idiots that can't consider the truth of thingsand if i was interested leading the charge of a bunch of dumb masses strung along by lies, i'd become a democrat. i don't care about lying at all, it's the fact that this isn't going to encourage a good set of ideas and people, only dumb ones. again, if you wanted to push distrust in the government via false conspiracies, you should just peddle the 5G / bill gates mark of the beast ones since it's the same idea
>telling people a false conspiracy in the hopes that it leads them to a true one is ridiculousthink of it this way
>"oh, so i was lying about that other one, but THIS one is true!"would you believe that?
the methodology you are suggesting seems like a quick route to just appearing malicious or discredited by anyone that can reason, and will only get you the support of stupid people who aren't worth gathering. the right wing already has enough of an issue of people pushing crazy unlikely or downright false theories without having another thrown into the mix
