>>10739562That's an interesting question. I think
>>10739563 is too simplistic an answer but it might be connected. I'll probably look into it at some point.
>>10739555I never said there aren't more aspects to anime art than sexualization, or ways to use the anime style that accomplish more than appeals to lust. You should read my whole post before dismissing my argument. I argue that using the anime style to reject Postmodernism is an interesting and important development.
>>10739568I have seen Your Name. Ghibli films as well. It's not true that there's no sexualization, especially in Your Name, but they are certainly works of art. I never dismissed that. Again, read my full analysis.
