>>10150367>Even the Assyrians, notoriously known in the ancient world for their brutality, realized it's better to deport and resettle conquered people instead of killing them all.Nobody cares, if the Romans said you die, you die, you don't argue, you are a barbarian, an inferior race, a literal ancient times niggers, they could whatever they wanted with people that were lazy to create breastplates.
>The Romans were under no existential threat from the Celts. they literally have a natural barrier protecting them - open a map.after defeating Carthage they just needed more gold and silver to fund their debauchery and deenracy.
As a Barbarian you do not understand how trade works, so it's going to be difficult to explain you why it is needed to genocide nigger tribes who manages to live by stealing others and murdering farmers.
>There's a reason Alexander focused on fighting other empires instead of "barbarian" tribes - he knew they were a much larger threat. the Romans simply wanted to expand.No, it is not an argument to suddenly invent some bullshit and claim it as truth
>>When the Romans were trying to establish a stable political environment so that a normal person could live in relative peaceYes, better sanitation, more jobs, more trade, more deals, more food, more quality of life, aqueducts, baths, sports, ect.. being a Roman citizen back then is very hard to imagine for us because the amount of wealth they shared in everything socially related is alien to us nowadays, we cannot understand but an intelligent can only imagine the reaction of a barbarian entering a Roman bath for the first time back then.
By simply telling you that they became entirely Romanized and that even to this day they are still proud of what they have brought to them, let alone the French Kings who larped as Romans, but again, everyone wanted to be Roman and LARP as them.
