>>11529231maybe, idk
the book needs some amount of philosophical tapistry on the walls; otherwise it'd be just about a narcissistic junkie that might be in a permament trip
if you don't flesh out characters to have their own ways of thinking they'll feel bland and dishonest, I want to have a realistic scene where one of the guys goes cleaning through the apartment and smokes some cbd that was left in a stache- but he gets high
he contacts another one of the characters and they delwe into a deeper mistery as to why he got high and what exactly did he smoke- with red herrings and convoluted conspiracies that get resolved by a simple but realistic explanation that gets neglected until later because it actually happened so quickly nobody even noticed it
>without dating themthat breaks the argument into two then
on one side you're not deeming them ugly but you're obviously not deeming them as fpretty, then why say they are pretty when they are not your type
on the other hand, people's whole lives seem to revolve around finding oartners and dismissing thag fact as if it doesn't matter for the argument is just disengenuous
>shed leave you if something happened to your bodymore likely than not, from evolutionary standpoint it is us men that are expandable and aside from hard patriarchal societies it is deemed immoral to leave a woman for most reasons, wheres it's perfectly normal for woman to leave a man if it's just smell of his breath that slightly irritates her
