>>15166252It did. Realize that a lot of the anti-Qtards are shills or ill-informed, but also a lot of sour grapes losers. The fact of the matter is that a lot of the things Q talks about were, in fact, talked about on /pol/ and even /b/ years before Q came along. The difference is Q figured out a way to package and present them in such a way that it attracted the attention of millions of people who were otherwise only lightly engaged in matters behind the curtain, and turned them into passionate people hungry for redpills. I remember long ago on /b/ when we used to fantasize about what would happen one day if someone in politics or the media started dispensing redpills in such a way that they caught on, and how it might change the world.
Well, it happened. Q did what /pol/tards could not. And many /pol/tards will never forgive Q for stealing their thunder. The butthurt will never fade, never abate. They HATE that they got one-upped, and they're selfish people who care more about getting the credit they feel they deserve than about seeing the world actually change, which it has, and will continue to do. Sucks for them. We're truly living in a rare kind of era.
