>>20753516>>20753536Interesting, I guess another way to describe it would be “Perceived”
Personally though I believe true reality exists objectively outside human perception. How we perceive the universe is only an incomplete observation. The universe is massive in both scale and compression, and we have not the means to fully observe it. Even with our increasing understanding of physics and scientific instruction which we use to paint a clearer picture of the universe, there is still much that has yet to be learned; spaces yet to be “seen” so to speak.
> We daily observe the effects of things that happened billions of years ago, and by observing those things, bring all of history into existence.This is a very astute observation, ‘time’ as we perceive it is moment engergy in the form of waves. If you’ve ever seen a digital oscilloscope waveform you’ll kinda know what I’m talking about. The frequency or oscillations of the waveform over a period of space is what we perceive as time, this is why we could theoretically be observing the light of long-dead starts in the night sky.
I’m starting to see what you are talking about and I think you might be on to something. Perhaps I was the midwit all along?
