>>27514>This is a false assumptionif we're going to throw out "the principle of sufficient reason" i have a new argument
p1: the sky is blue
p2: frog
c: therefore, God exists
>You're making the false assumption that what was before the universe was not always therebased on the incoherence of an infinite temporal regression of events and the impossibility of an actual infinite, which you didn't address
>Flawed syllogism based on false assumptions and infantile analysis results in irrational conclusion.nice stilted language, you look so smart
