>>13440427>We actually can.No has has ever said mutations cant be seen. Funny though, how your example is defects and "bad" mutations. Show us one observable example of a good mutation.
>A common misconception is that we need to observe something in order for it to be true.Yes that is correct. You cant prove something happened unless you watched it. If you're a detective and you have witnesses vs blood spatter forensics etc, which one is right?
>t was created on a planet rich with methan, carbon dioxide, and sulfur.Its funny how you dont mention oxygen or ammonia. Ammonia is also needed for the life youre talking about, but it also needs ozone to stop the UV light from destroying it. If theres no ammonia, life cant evolve. If theres oxygen, it will oxidize and cant evolve.
>There are quite a few theories on that.There are tons of theories on everything. We have a theory that God created everything and that he gave us the bible to understand.
>The main issue with this is the assumption that if the universe is too complicated to just happen, then it had to be created.No, you are just a mental midget.
Irreducible complexity says that the systems we observe today are far too complex to lose even one component, so how could it have survived without one of the components for so long? This applies to everything, not just biology. Geology, cosmology, etc.
